Talk:List of cannon projectiles
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of cannon projectiles article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from List of cannon projectiles appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shell
[edit]The definition of shell seems far too narrow. The reference is from 1859 yet it refers to high explosive - not likely in 1859. Cyclopaedic (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Fuze/fuse
[edit]Anybody wish to advice which is the correct spelling? I thought that it should be "fuze", which it was originally, but somebody helpfully changed them all to fuse years back. My understanding is that "fuse" is a simple burning thing whereas "fuze" is a more sophisticated and/or embedded detonation system but I feel my knowledge on the subject isn't sufficient to say so with any degree of authority.
Edit: this isn't an ENGVAR thing AFAIK. --Vometia (talk) 04:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- List-Class military history articles
- List-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- List-Class Firearms articles
- Low-importance Firearms articles
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- List-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles