Talk:List of county routes in Elko County, Nevada
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Non-notable?
[edit]I don't see any reason this article is any more non-notable than any of the dozens of other county route lists on Wikipedia. Famartin (talk) 07:08, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
- See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for what that is not a valid line of reasoning to use in defense. Also, WP:GNG tells us that we need "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list" which this article lacks. Notability hasn't been satisfied here, which is the bar we use to determine if this article should exist. Even if other similar articles exist, they weren't the ones being proposed for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
- Could you explain how you come to the conclusion in a bit more detail about how this article fails the notability test? Your claim that it simply doesn't is not helpful. Famartin (talk) 08:05, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
- GNG says that the subject matter needs "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"
- "significant coverage" would be about the specific subject, not passing mentions
- "reliable sources"... no blogs, etc.
- "independent of the subject", in this case, not from the county highway department
- Those points must be satisfied to demonstrate notability. Imzadi 1979 → 09:19, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
- So pretty much you are saying that because no one lives here, its not notable (because those are all results of the low population of this region, I can assure you... in a more populated place, I'm sure all those would exist). Famartin (talk) 18:36, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
- Do the local newspapers discuss the county roads there? Are they mentioned in local guide books? Are the numbers used on locally produced maps of the area? You don't need newspaper coverage from The New York Times to justify notability, when the local newspaper satisfies the criteria. However, if the numbers are just used internally with the county road department, have no real currency with the local population, then a list of them doesn't merit inclusion in the encyclopedia. Imzadi 1979 → 22:34, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
- So pretty much you are saying that because no one lives here, its not notable (because those are all results of the low population of this region, I can assure you... in a more populated place, I'm sure all those would exist). Famartin (talk) 18:36, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
- GNG says that the subject matter needs "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"
- Could you explain how you come to the conclusion in a bit more detail about how this article fails the notability test? Your claim that it simply doesn't is not helpful. Famartin (talk) 08:05, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of county routes in Elko County, Nevada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150716000827/http://www.scenicdrivesusa.com/node/121 to http://www.scenicdrivesusa.com/node/121
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)