Talk:List of natural gas fields

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Energy (Rated List-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Geology (Rated List-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon List of natural gas fields is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

KG-D6 - India's new field[edit]

Added KG-D6 based on recently published news article This field is purported to have 9.2 trillion cubic feet - not sure if that's proven, possible, etc., of the reserves. -hairyPotter- —Preceding unsigned comment added by HairyPotter (talkcontribs) 10:12, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


Added Sable Gas feild off of the southern coast of Nova Scotia. -Meanie-

The South Pars gas field, one of the largest in the world, should probably be added. South Pars holds between 280 Tcf and 500 Tcf. In addition Qatar's North Field is estimated at 380 Tcf.

Commking 22:27, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Concerning missing figures on Troll field in the article: Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (2006 fact book) says 1325 bcm recoverable resources. Utvinnbare reservar Opphavleg: 1324,9 milliardar Sm3 gass 30,5 millionar tonn NGL

South Pars / North Dome field[edit]

I discovered the article South Pars / North Dome Gas-Condensate field, which treats those fields together, as well as North dome field, which treats that part as separate. Is there a consensus somewhere on whether this field should be regarded as one or two fields for this list? --Alvestrand 13:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

It is essentially one field, geologically - the names refer to the political division, and perhaps (I'm not sure) the production is separate in the two countries. So I'd support combining the two articles. "North Dome" is probably more well known, but however the merger is done there should be redirects using both names. Cheers Geologyguy 14:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Bontang Natural Gas Field[edit] 07:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Bontang, an Indonesian Natural Gas Field should have been included. With 22.5 tpa of LNG capacity, Bontang is one of the largest producing gas field on earth.

Bontang — oil'n'gas project, main gas fields of this proj are Mahakam area and Peciko field, were added. 23:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC).

Marcellus and Haynesville Shales[edit]

Why aren't the Marcellus and Haynesville shales listed in the top list?

Actually, I think the US should have 4 locations in the top 10...

Msjayhawk (talk) 18:38, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

South Pars/ North Dome[edit]

In the list there is a reserve of 35,000km³ (35 trillion m³), in the article itself 51 trillion m³ are the reserve, according to the International Energy Agency the reserves are 50.97 trillion m³ is written in the reference [1], or do you take the reserves only from 1 reference like "the top 50 natural gas fields" or something like that?

Greetings Kilon22 (talk) 23:05, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

    Triggered by \boffshore-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:19, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Suggest merge all data into sortable table[edit]

How about we merge all the lists into one sortable table?--Graham Proud (talk) 02:25, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

the same field appears twice[edit]

The turkmen field south yolotan is reported twice the ranking ! -- (talk) 08:44, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

initial or remaining reserves?[edit]

The article talks repeatedly about the reserves of each fields. If we want ot compare their size, it's logical to use initial reserves, but it could as well refer to remaining reserves (the difference being, obviously, what has been produced already). Fields like hassi R'mel or Urengoy are exploited for decade and severely depleted, so the figures would be very different. This must be clarified. Raminagrobis (talk) 23:04, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

  1. ^ [1]