Talk:List of newspapers published in Metro Manila

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Consensus[edit]

We all aspire to make the best article for all Wikipedia users. Continually reverting edits done by other Wikipedians should be avoided and discussion should be done in order to reach a consensus.--Jose de Cura 02:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi. If you are going to fix someone's citation of a source, at least do it properly and understand what is being cited. The author is irrelevant to the assertion i inserted as the book does state it is merely basing this finding from an outside source, the A4 Media Factbook.--RioHondo (talk) 02:23, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I definitely did it properly and astutely my dear fellow. Not to be rude, you paraphrased the article of the author not quite sufficiently to put it on mildly. Citing the author is not irrelevant in any kind of writing, because the purpose is to make it look more professionally written and convenient for Wikipedia users. Since Wikipedia is an Encyclopaedic website, academic style of writing applies my dear fellow. When someone edit's an article, it is meant to make it better for everyone, nothing personal old chap.--Jose de Cura 02:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
  - Now you have a second source asserting the same thing. It's fairly common knowledge and so out there. There's nothing very academic about a listing anyway.--RioHondo (talk) 02:43, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Good for you dear fellow! Now you are finally learning the right way to cite additional sources and write accordingly. Good luck in your endeavours dear follow.--Jose de Cura 03:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)