Talk:Lolita City

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Pedophilia Article Watch (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Pedophilia Article WatchWikipedia:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchTemplate:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchPedophilia Article Watch articles

What to display in the web address field when we don't give a link[edit]

There is consensus that for at least some onion sites that we should not give a link to the site from the article. At Talk:The Hidden Wiki#Web address field in the infobox I have raised a question about what we should show in the infobox in place of a link in those cases, your views would be welcome there. Thryduulf (talk) 09:23, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since this site is offline, does that change anything? I'm not sure it would be at all useful to link to a defunct website, and I'm equally unsure whether it would be legal to link to a prohibited website, even if it is defunct. The only usefulness I can think of for publishing the URL in the article is in cases where the URL itself is interesting. An example of that is silkroad6ownowfk.onion for Silk Road (marketplace), because .onion addresses are generated randomly and that is obviously not a random .onion address. Badon (talk) 20:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Victims[edit]

It is not neutral to describe the people in the images hosted as "victims" without a source that explicitly calls all of them that. The definition of what constitutes child pornography varies by jurisdiction, and no reliable source I can find states that every image was pornographic even under US law (although it is unclear why that would apply to a site apparently hosted in Ireland?). Thryduulf (talk) 23:01, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't help with that. Lolita City is not well covered on the internet.--Tco03displays (talk) 09:50, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Although it's possible not all things the site hosted would be unanimously considered to be depicting "victims" of child pornography in all jurisdictions, it does appear that all mentions of this site are unanimous in the opinion that it did indeed contain at least some things that would be illegal in all jurisdictions. On that basis, I think the use of the word "victims" is appropriate even if some parts of this site possibly did not involve "victims", because as far as I can tell that's the only thing that makes the website notable enough to have an article in Wikipedia. With that said, child pornography is an unverifiable crime, so an earnest discussion like this can never be resolved completely, because (presumably) no one here can ever see for themselves what the article subject is (a website that is illegal to view). Badon (talk) 20:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Current incarnation of Lolita City[edit]

Any idea if we should include the current incarnation on wikipedia? (Assuming it's related to the more-notorious LC), given that this incarnation hosts only "hq legal stuff" 72.78.199.240 (talk) 00:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone can rip off a template of a website and spin up their own onion service. This article is about the "original" website (identified by the unique onion address, the hostname generated by a unique pair of hs_ed25519 key pair). We do not talk about supposed incarnations. --WikiLinuz {talk} 🍁 06:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]