Talk:Louise Leakey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Is the purpose of this article to show that L. Leakey is a good scientist, or that she's somebody who's good to invite to parties for prestige value? The fact that she's the youngest person to discover hominid fossils is a misquote of the source, which itself is distinguished by sections titled "WHY SHE RULES" and referring to the Leakeys as a "famous family dynasty" ( Often, in scientific circles, a young discovery implies some special ability, but here what happened is she picked up a tooth on the ground.

Comments such as "well exceeding her father's formal academic credentials" seem like straight vanity. Has she "well exceeded" her father's accomplishments, too? Stick to the facts. (talk) 19:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Though I'm not nearly as annoyed about it as the above person, I'll be removing superfluous aspects of the article as well. I'd like to note, however, that Louise Leakey exceeding her father's formal academic credentials might very well be fact -- it's just not necessarily relevant fact. Seijihyouronka (talk) 20:56, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

The remarks about her academic powers were probably put in by Julius Sahara, and not by Louise herself. "Julius Sahara" seems to be a black Kenyan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:33, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
He notes that his real name is not Julius Sahara. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 11:48, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

German over-looked[edit]

Louise, in her remarks on, seems to have over-looked the German Kattwinkel and credited her grand-parents with the discovery of Olduvai. All three, the Leakeys and Kattwinkel, would not have been in Africa if it had not been for the earlier European invasion, not itself actuated by any scientific motive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:17, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Louise Leakey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 7 January 2018 (UTC)