This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
We have pictures now. Unfortunately the theme implies that the only people who wear them are pornographic actresses. --Juventas (talk) 02:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've got a picture, but it is deamed as "unrelated image" and thus removed. Bodysuit, a fashion Item onward from the 1950s to mid 1990s and again before entering the 2010s, that covers the bottom cleft of women. Here in red as a variant for evening wear--Tobias ToMar Maier (talk) 02:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the following paragraph from the article for bad grammar, spelling, and general bad flow in the article. It used to be the first paragraph under the 1990s-2000s revival section.
"a separate style from "hip huggers", Brazilian and Lowrise jeans where already being worn and stylized regularly by the Hispanic and Black Caribbean, and African American Communities for decades, especially in Brazil. Throughout the Hispanic, and Caribbean world many young girls and older women where regularly wearing ultra lowrise jeans. "
24.27.220.21608:39, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Various portions of this article were taken from original research, yet the source was not properly cited. Should I just add them to the article ? I ask because it was once listed as a source, but appear to have been improperly removed.
This article is so US-biased it credited Britney Spears with popularising the bumster when Alexander McQueen developed them and was showing them five years earlier in 1996. The whole article is written from a US perspective only. I've added a bit about McQueen - with references, which the rest of the article lacks - but am not qualified to write more. It needs editors with a worldwide perspective, not just a US one. 86.150.103.254 (talk) 14:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
We seem to have an edit war over whether to include an image of a male's whale tail in the article. Nymf and myself, Juventas, removed it. Peaboy and 218.186.18.231 (possibly the same person) reverted the removal.
There are several reasons I don't think it belongs: it's not representitive of the fact that the vast majority of wearers do not expose their underwear as part of the fashion, men who do expose their underwear as part of the fashion are much more likely to choose sagging (fashion), and the image quality is so poor it's not even clear that he's wearing jeans. There is a whale tail article, and it does not include this image (or any other of a male). --Juventas (talk) 01:42, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The one with the girl dressed in white, nipples clearly visible through the top. I know WP:UNCENSORED, however, I am sure there is a less sexual picture, given that this isn't an article that needs to be sexual. Spiderone19:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on Low-rise pants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
