Talk:Low culture

Culture Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Popular culture (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture articles

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Purplethekid. Peer reviewers: Lpastorella.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate for deletion?

As best as I can tell, this is just an OR commentary. Anybody care to defend it before I nominate it for deletion?

Wikipedia does need some sort of entry on 'low culture' - whether or not we think that this entry cuts it, and whether or not we agree with the high/low cultural distinction. It is such a pervasive concept that it would be remiss not to refer to it in an encyclopedia. It has its place in a history of ideas, even if we are all thoroughgoing postmodernists now, who spurn the dichotomy :) --82.152.252.94 (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC) do not delete —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.214.150 (talk) 18:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think an article on Low Culture that's lacking impact or substance is perfect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.18.119.80 (talk) 21:32, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be deleted because it is a descent start on a needed article. SirBrainChild (talk) 05:50, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim that it is guided by what people like.

See for instance propaganda model for some mechanisms that help determine what is on for instance TV.88.159.64.241 (talk) 20:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

peer review--jenny

From the lead, I saw the definition of “low culture”, and it reports that It has been said by culture theorists that both high culture and low culture are subcultures. However, the readers may have no idea about “subcultures”. So, I think it should add more explanation.

The sections are organized well and easy to see it included three main parts-- standards and definitions of low culture, culture as the class and mass media. It makes sense, but personally, I think it should add more examples because the topic “low culture” is an abstract term, and it needs more examples to support. In see also part, you might explain a little the feature of Bogan.

The balance is ok, there are there are no major viewpoints left out, just add some outstanding school and style.

The language used in the article seems professional, and the readers easily believe the author’s words. There is no subjective thought in the article. No words like "the best," "most people," "obviously” or unnamed groups or people.

The sources used in the article mainly from books, which seems reliable. However, I think you should add more, there are only two sources even though you used in the different pages of the book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sitongchen (talk • contribs) 00:22, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Foundations of Feminism

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2023 and 1 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kattoro (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Kattoro (talk) 23:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Mass Media and Society

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ljc22b, Pangalan.ko (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Schwammy1, Tikey105!, Rossannm, Airalia, Anonymousardvark, Anonymous - JJH 8.

— Assignment last updated by Iamclandestined (talk) 04:25, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]