Talk:Luster (film)
Luster (film) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Plot
[edit]The synopsis written in the article is too detaild and sequence by sequence. It is not possible for a reader who has not seen the movie yet to grasp a whole picture of the movie by reading this plot. The characters are so undeveloped at the begining of the text that through the text we are just jumping from one name to another. So I think we should recompose the text with some step backwards.
Infuse queerness
[edit]Does anyone else find the phrase "infuse queerness" a tad out-of-touch and pseudo-intellectual? The same phrase is used in explaining this film on the Blue page. When a film is made about homosexual characters and homosexual issues how could it not be "infused with queerness"? Was Titanic "infused with sea-travel"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.232.225.2 (talk) 21:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- It's a quote from the director, Everett Lewis, from a documentary included on the DVD. I suggest taking the pseudo-intellectualism issue up with him, but for our purposes we go with what he says and don't evaluate or analyze it. Otto4711 (talk) 21:04, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Luster (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051203183643/http://www.calendarlive.com:80/movies/reviews/cl-et-kevin17oct17,2,2890535.story to http://www.calendarlive.com/movies/reviews/cl-et-kevin17oct17,2,2890535.story
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Luster (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080419041015/http://www.villagevoice.com:80/film/0337,tracking,46866,20.html to http://www.villagevoice.com/film/0337,tracking,46866,20.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)