Talk:Lycus (river of Constantinople)

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Turkey Low‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Lycus (river of Constantinople) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 June 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Byzantine's weak defenses around the Lycus valley played a pivotal role in the fall of Constantinople?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lycus (river of Constantinople).

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 22:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

The Lycus valley at the Theodosian walls looking north in 1836

... that on 29 May 1453 the Ottomans penetrated Constantinople from the Lycus valley (pictured)?

Source: This part of the walls is the most vulnerable...since here the fortifications descend in the valley of the Lycus...it was this section of the wall that was finally breached...on the morning of 29 May 1453. Freely (1991), p. 279

Reviewed: Bulgur Palas
Comment: As alternative to the displayed picture we could use this engraving, which shows the bottom of the valley near the walls.

Created by Alessandro57 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 81 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Alex2006 (talk) 05:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article reached Good Article status within 7 days of nomination. QPQ is done. Image licensing is fine. The references look reliable and basic facts can be verified online, though I wish a more typical referencing format was used. I do recommend that the nominator adds some online, English-language references to complement the books and the two Turkish online sources used in the article.

The hook is cited within the article, although it is a little difficult to find - if it is the most important historical fact about this river, then it should be mentioned in the lead and preferably described as a sub-section, rather than mentioned in a single line by the end. For the hook itself, I think that the date isn't so important, and the strategic aspect should be emphasized more. Suggested wording: ... that weak defences around the Lycus valley played a pivotal role in the Fall of Constantinople? InformationToKnowledge (talk) 23:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alessandro57: Please address the above concerns. Z1720 (talk) 23:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pinging, I totally forgot this. I will address the concerns during the weekend. Alex2006 (talk) 06:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@InformationToKnowledge:, and thanks for your review. Unfortunately, I could not find sources in English that describe Lycus geographically and hydrologically in detail. however, I have added a couple of online sources for what concerns history. I have created a subsection on the siege of Constantinople and expanded it. Regarding the hook, I think yours is definitely better:

ALT1... that weak defenses around the Lycus valley (pictured) played a pivotal role in the Fall of Constantinople?

Question: which of the two images do you think is better? Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 07:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alessandro57: Great! The article is a lot better now. I think more English online sources can be added still, even if they only help to cover its military history - i.e. just today, on the event's anniversary, this article was published and it refers to the Byzantine Emperor personally fighting in that position, which is a very interesting detail. However, that can be addressed at any time, and I am passing the nomination on this anniversary.

Question: which of the two images do you think is better? - Is the other image

? I certainly prefer that one, as the walls are more immediately visible. The image you included here looks a lot like typical countryside without zooming in closer. InformationToKnowledge (talk) 16:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, @InformationToKnowledge:, I changed the image. Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 07:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]