Talk:Maracaibo Basin
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Louisiana State University/GEOL 4131: Basin Studies (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
Major page edit
[edit]Hello,
I am editing this page as part of a class project and will be adding more in-depth information about the basin.
Thank you,
Shelbyrich (talk) 04:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Shelbyrich
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Maracaibo Basin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609102306/http://www.cuug.ab.ca/~johnstos/maracaibo.html to http://www.cuug.ab.ca/~johnstos/maracaibo.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Need to write for a wider audience
[edit]Forgive me for butting in, but is not WP meant to provide articles for a wider readership than just professionals in the area concerned? And if so, this article is not successful. It makes no attempt to address a wider audience. Many technical terms are not even linked, nor explained. How would an above-average 15-year old get on with this article? Or, for that matter, any reader without a good background in Earth sciences? I doubt if it would be accepted for any of the semi-popular geology magazines without substantial revision. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC)