Talk:Matilda Cruises

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Matilda Cruises.jpg[edit]

Image:Matilda Cruises.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Captain Cook Cruises, Australia[edit]

It is felt that this article should be merged into Captain Cook Cruises, Australia which is a new page, with Matilda Cruises redirecting to Captain Cook Cruises, Australia.

The fleet shown in this article is in fact not just the Matilda Cruises fleet but the full fleet of Captain Cook Cruises, Sydney.Fleet Lists (talk) 02:14, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Correct heading in previous update. Fleet Lists (talk) 02:16, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some further research has found that Matilda Cruises was sold to Captain Cook Cruises some years ago and the article has been updated to reflect that. It is now not appropriate that the network and fleet information should be in this article in its present format. Rather than merge the two articles I would now suggest that the network and fleet information be moved to the new Captain Cook article under a Sydney heading. If I dont get any reaction to this, I will look at doing this in about a weeks time.Fleet Lists (talk) 02:50, 7 December 2014 (UTC) This was done today.Fleet Lists (talk) 03:22, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]