Talk:Melodiya
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Inaccuracies
[edit]"After having disappeared from the market since 2004, Melodiya started rereleasing their recordings in 2006." Actually, after the contract with MBG expired in 2003 the company re-opened under a new management and started building its own world-wide distribution network. Coincidentally, in 2003 Russian government passed a new copyright legislation (including the so called "retro-protection clause"). Melodiya faced (and lost) numerous copyright lawsuits.
"There is also a modern radio station in Russia known as Kanal Melodiya ..." This mentioning might not be relevant to the topic. There is no sign of affiliation (or any relevant relationship) between the radio station and the Melodiya record label.
I agree, I have removed the Trivia section. Galltywenallt (talk) 12:30, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Need for full article
[edit]The topic deserves a full-length article with more historical and technical details, including the pre-Melodiya era. The Soviet recording industry was, after all, the largest in the world. In the meantime I've added a reference to another site that explains the numbering system and gives a few more facts.Galltywenallt (talk) 20:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Melodiya logo.svg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Melodiya logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
78 rpm
[edit]Were the 78s really made of vinyl, or were they shellac, as in the west? Rothorpe (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
DGG, Philips
[edit]There were recordings by such performers as Emil Gilels (including a project of Beethoven piano sonatas) appearing both on Melodiya and Deutsche Grammophon and Mstislav Rostropovich (Beethoven cello sonatas, with Sviatoslav Richter) appearing on both Melodiya and Philips Records.
How do you pronounce it?
[edit]I've been looking all over the web (including Melodiya's own English-language home page) and I can't find any description of how to pronounce the name: is it me-LO-di-ya or me-lo-DI-ya or something else? Bhami (talk) 05:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Melodiya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718023541/http://www.audaud.com/article.php?ArticleID=4477 to http://www.audaud.com/article.php?ArticleID=4477
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Conflicting Dates
[edit]At the beginning of the History section, it states that the label was started in 1964. In the fourth paragraph of the same section, it states that the company has applied a single numbering system since 1933. That's 31 years before it started, if the first paragraph is accurate. This needs clarification. David Fell (talk) 13:41, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- WikiProject Classical music articles
- Start-Class record labels articles
- Unknown-importance record labels articles
- WikiProject Record Labels articles
- Start-Class Russia articles
- High-importance Russia articles
- High-importance Start-Class Russia articles
- Start-Class Russia (performing arts) articles
- Performing arts in Russia task force articles
- Start-Class Russia (economy) articles
- Economy of Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- Start-Class Soviet Union articles
- Mid-importance Soviet Union articles
- WikiProject Soviet Union articles
- Start-Class Brands articles
- Unknown-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles