Talk:Menzies Research Centre
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Australia may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Fair use rationale for Image:Mrc logo.gif
[edit]Image:Mrc logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
[edit]"As a leading public policy institute ..." - this paragraph is lifted directly off the institute's own website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.12.172.254 (talk) 02:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- I have deleted the paragraph you refer to- it read very much like an advertisement, and did not seem to me like it added any new information that wasn't mentioned elsewhere in the article. I believe it is now ready for the 'Conflict of interest' tag to be removed- do you agree? WotherspoonSmith (talk) 13:45, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Stub-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- Stub-Class organization articles
- Low-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Australia