Talk:Merrow F.C.

Football: England / English non-league Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Surrey Low‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed deletion

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Alexf^(talk) 14:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose -- recommend merge-and-redirect instead. I can understand (and do not specifically contest) the reasons for the proposed deletion (article apparently fails WP:ORG, WP:ATHLETE, WP:FOOTYN (non-professional) notability criteria). However, I would suggest that conversion to a redirect would be more appropriate, since that will allow the category membership to be retained, even after the article content is merged into Merrow, Surrey#Merrow F.C..

No personal involvement with club, I just happen to live in Merrow, and it's on my watchlist... -- EdJogg (talk) 13:37, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with a merge. -- Alexf^(talk) 14:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Query --- when this article was first created (2006) the club were in the Combined Counties League and hence qualified for playing in the FA Cup. Two years later, the club dropped a couple of divisions, and now at Level 12 they no longer qualify. Hence, the club used to meet one of the criteria for Footy notability. Shouldn't this notability persist, regardless of the current level of the club? If the club no longer existed, as of 2006, it would still technically be WP-notable, surely? -- EdJogg (talk) 14:02, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. It is something to be discussed more at length at WT:FOOTY but I see the logic in it. Personally, if it could be shown it was once in the notable leagues, through sourcing, it should then still be notable. -- Alexf^(talk) 14:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I found a series of archives of the Combined Counties League, so I've included these as refs. Teams in this league are eligible for participation in the FA Cup / FA Trophy, I believe, although I don't know whether Merrow have ever taken part during their 88-year history. Is that sufficient to un-PROD? -- EdJogg (talk) 02:12, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merrow FC page in Internet Archive

Digging around I found both the official site for the Combined Counties league, (which includes some statistics and tables in their archives, mentioning Merrow) and that they had pages for each club. Merrow's page has been deleted, but may be found via the Wayback Machine:
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.combinedcountiesleague.co.uk/merrow.htm

EdJogg (talk) 02:41, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Merrow F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:29, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Merrow F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160114141908/http://www.surreyfa.com/previous-winners-and-officials/saturday-intermediate-cup-previous-winners to http://www.surreyfa.com/previous-winners-and-officials/saturday-intermediate-cup-previous-winners

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]