Jump to content

Talk:Milwaukee City Hall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This article doesn't make sense. It surpassed the Manhattan Life building as being the tallest in the world, but was only the third tallest when it was completed? How does that make sense? --216.207.86.82 18:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has to do with how skyscrapers are measured (topmost accessable floor, spires and flag poles, etc)... if I recall, by one metric, City Hall was the tallest inhabited structure when built, but the Washington Monument was taller. Sulfur 07:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Philadelphia City Hall was also taller. mmathu 23 September 2011 —Preceding undated comment added 14:34, 23 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The whole tallest building stuff doesn't make sense at best and is misleading at worst..the metric used seems to be pretty much made up. "Not being habitable" seems not to be a reasonable criterion for excluding things like churches from being called a "building". If it happened to be the building with the highest living quarters of some inhabitants at some time, then this should be be mentioned as some sort of trivia. But it should not be claimed to have been the "tallest building of the world at some time", with the actual and very dubious definition provided merely by an asterisk. There is a conflict by the way, the Ulm Cathedral (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulm_Cathedral at 167 meters compared to 108 of the MCH) gives the very same definition of the metric used to determine it to having been the tallest building of the world at the same time when the MHC is claimed to be. If the height of the highest habitable floor is used to determine such status, then the actual height of this floor should be listed instead of implying that the overall size of the building was used.80.131.226.253 18:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to this page, the building is built in the German Renaissance Revival style, but according to the city's official history of the building, the architecture is Flemish Renaissance Revival. Is there a reliable source somewhere which can definitively state German or Flemish? Paris1127 (talk) 02:19, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007 fire

[edit]

I'm removing the reference, since the cited link has expired and by itself a minor fire in a public building doesn't seem that important (Will anybody remember or care in ten years?). --Chancemichaels 14:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Chancemichaels[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Milwaukee City Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Milwaukee City Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]