Jump to content

Talk:Minnesota State Lottery

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Better lead

[edit]

Information found on official website for the state of Minnesota Lottery.

I think we need a better intro opener, but I am short on words ::cough:: ::cough:: (hint: someone else write this!)

Grandeandy 00:36, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Minimum age

[edit]

Minnesota almost raised the minimum age for all gambling to 21, which is the case in Iowa. However, the Indian casino lobby refused to go along IIRC. Having a complete listing of a state's scratch games is a questionable idea. These games are very frequently added, and withdrawn. I also would like to see Hot Lotto available in more states. I live near Connecticut, the closest Powerball state; the nearest with Hot Lotto is New Hampshire. 216.179.123.239 22:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mnlottery.jpg

[edit]

Image:Mnlottery.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion

[edit]

I've tagged Northstar Cash and Gopher 5 for mergers, as I don't feel that single-state games are sufficiently independently notable to support their own articles. Readers would be better served by improved sections in the main state lottery article, where they can be covered with the appropriate level of detail. oknazevad (talk) 19:07, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Minnesota State Lottery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minnesota State Lottery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional-style content and broken table

[edit]

I removed unsourced content that read like an advertisement for the lottery and a table with broken coding. I see that the article is undergoing several recent edits. If I removed your edits and you disagree, happy to discuss further, or feel free to revert my edits. Other lottery articles (e.g., California State Lottery, Texas Lottery, Illinois State Lottery, etc.) seem to also be based heavily on primary sources and include information on winnings, rules of play, etc. The Minnesota lottery article seems to be no worse / no better than other articles the genre. Minnemeeples (talk) 17:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think your assessment of the notability of individual state lotteries makes sense, specifically the reliance on primary sources. I do think any claims or interpretations that go beyond simple factual statement probably should be supported by WP:SECONDARY sources whenever possible. I also think care has to be made to avoid turning the article into a Wikipedia version of the lottery's official website or a guidebook on the lottery because that's not really the purpose of Wikipedia article. The image use also was a bit excess, particularly since most of them were non-free content. The use of images came up at WP:MCQ#Ludicrous where I tried to point out how restrictive Wikipedia's non-free content use policy can be. Other than the primary logo being used in the main infobox, it's going to be quite hard to justify the use of any other non-free images throughout the article per WP:DECORATIVE, WP:NFC#cite_note-4, MOS:LOGO, WP:NFTABLES and WP:NFC#CS; simply wanting to show the non-free logos is generally not considered sufficient to justify a non-free use if there's no real sourced commentary specifically about the logo itself. Logos used for primary identification purposes in the main infobox usually are considered OK, but logos used throughout the body of an article tend to be harder to justify. The article is currently without any citations at all, which is not a good thing; so, instead of adding more unsourced content like was done here it would be better to try and find sources to support the existing content or trim out any contentious content that can't be reliably sourced., and then work on expanding the article if possible. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:32, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I agree with that. I boldly removed a lot of content, but I have no intention of starting an edit war if someone disagrees with some or all of the content deletion and suggests why it should go back. It does seem like most of the state lottery articles contain promotional content from primary sources, and are about how to play it, rather than why the lottery is socially and economically relevant. Many are flagged for various issues, but not consistently so. A project should clean all of them up and come up with a standard format or outline (e.g., History, Rules of Play, Controversies, etc.) and how to rate them. I'm just giving an opinion. I don't have much bandwidth for improvement of this one right now, but can provide another perspective if needed (just tag me). Good luck to you! Minnemeeples (talk) 02:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who has edited the state lottery articles over the years, my only concern is that completely removing the sections on which games are offered seems excessive. That's a pretty defining element of a lottery, just as the article on any provider should to some extent or another include which products are offered. It doesn't need to be overly detailed, or give a HOWTO, I agree, but removing it entirely is an over-correction. oknazevad (talk) 08:10, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. What should be added back and what are the best sources for it? Minnemeeples (talk) 22:10, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A simple list of games (including which multi-state games the lottery participates in), and their general format (i.e., if it's a version of a numbers game, or a draw-six lotto). As for sources, the official site is sufficient; per WP:PSTS, being simple statements of fact with no analysis or likely dispute, a primary source is not unacceptable. Honestly, I think much of the deleted sections should be restored and trimmed, instead of completely removed. oknazevad (talk) 03:05, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Though, the logos for the individual games can't stay per WP:NFCC, so their removal was correct. oknazevad (talk) 03:06, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the list of games published that you mentioned? Happy to take a look. The former content did not have inline citations, and included an awful lot of marketing/lobbying-style content. Minnemeeples (talk) 04:53, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look at this revision. Simple list of games with short descriptions. Links to each game's page at the lottery's website would be a sufficient ref to establish the existence and format of each game. oknazevad (talk) 13:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Much of this is uncited and out of date. What contemporary sources do you suggest that indicate which of these games are still offered? Minnemeeples (talk) 14:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The official lottery website, which had he wrong url in the infobox, by the way. There is zero wrong with using it as a reference to establish basic fact. oknazevad (talk) 14:20, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Which webpage in particular? I agree that there is a time and place for primary sources to establish certain facts with the proper weighting and context. The prior article relied almost entirely on uncited primary(?) sources and lists of information from annual legislative reports. It also included content about non-notable people, and relied on blog posts as sources (e.g., [1]). I will try to build back in which games are offered, but I would prefer to confirm what is offered, rather than reinserting disputed content. Thanks for the discussion. I don't want it to appear that I "own" the article. Just trying to help bring it up to a higher standard. Minnemeeples (talk) 14:32, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The official website's "Games" page. We don't need to get too detailed on the way each is played, which is why I pointed at that particular prior revision, as I think it balances the text well, just needs the inline citations to specify each paragraph, as opposed to relying entirely on the external links as it did before (which means it wasn't technically uncited, but it was a poor format). Of course it also needs to be updated, as Hot Lotto was replaced by Lotto America, and they've added the print-and-play games (which are like scratch cards without the scratching). oknazevad (talk) 14:37, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I plan to add some updated revenue information soon. I added the games offered and links to the main articles. Other state games offered tend to change. The articles does not necessarily need to list out every non-notable game. Other thoughts or feedback? Minnemeeples (talk) 21:50, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I don't think we need to list out the individual scratch-off or print-and-play games as those cycle seasonally, just mention that they exist. The other draw games can be listed individually. oknazevad (talk) 23:41, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Minnesota_State_Lottery&oldid=1204827118"