Talk:Mmm Papi

Mmm Papi was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 21, 2011	Articles for deletion	Kept
April 28, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
May 4, 2013	Good topic candidate	Promoted
January 3, 2021	Articles for deletion	Redirected
January 3, 2021	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Britney Spears

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Britney Spears, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Britney Spears on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Britney SpearsWikipedia:WikiProject Britney SpearsTemplate:WikiProject Britney SpearsBritney Spears articles

Songs

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles

Is This Real?

There are no references and it wasn't announced by Jive or from her official website. I'm guessing this is fake. I would delete the page myself if I knew how... Hpswimmer (talk) 04:53, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get the point behind it

Why do Mmm Papi and Lace and Leather have their own pages. I mean they haven't charted. That's why Kill The Lights, Shattered Glass and Big Fat Bass have their own pages, but these ones?? User:RuuBjAh (talk) 21:21, 28 May 2011

Mmm Papi and Lace and Leather did charted on Pop 100. However, L&L wasn't notable enough, so it got deleted. Mmm Papi received a lot of reviews from media, plus it leaked before the albums official release, and charted at number 94 on Billboard Pop 100. The producers also gave interviews about the song, making it notable enough to have its own article. - Sauloviegas (talk) 10:36, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charts table

Where is it?????? Major flaw in this supposed GA... Aaron • ^{You Da One} 13:46, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article deletion

This song was not a single and is not notable in her discography in any way. The entire page should be deleted. Songs that actually were considered to be singles such as (I Got That) Boom Boom and Get Back are much more deserving of articles than a random album track. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User5482 (talk • contribs) 07:10, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mmm Papi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]