Talk:Montauk Point Light

Lighthouses High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lighthouses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lighthouses and other water navigational aids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LighthousesWikipedia:WikiProject LighthousesTemplate:WikiProject LighthousesLighthouses articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): Long Island

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Long Island, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Huge Factual Mistake By Newsday in article criticizing Wikipedia

You can't make this up. Newsday in an article by a reporter and six contributors criticizes Wikipedia coverage of Long Island. But the very first item cited by Newsday (the Montauk Point Lighthouse has a huge factual error. The April 17, 2007 article is headlined "Consider the source As a matter of fact, Wikipedia isn't always right on LI" You can read it here

The article's first criticism is about the lighthouse which reads:

The landmark Montauk Point Lighthouse is mentioned in Wikipedia as having been completed in 1792, which Newsday stories show was finished in 1796.

You can see that blurb with photo here.

The Wikipedia article on the Montauk Point Lighthouse in the third paragraph states:

Construction on the lighthouse was authorized by the Second United States Congress, under President George Washington in 1792. Construction began on June 7, 1796, and was completed on November 5, 1796.

If you look at the history, the information has been in there virtually from the start with virtually no vandalism.

If this mistake had been made in Wikipedia it could have been corrected instantly. On Newsday the mistake is forever.

I can't imagine an opportunity for a better argument on the merits of Wikipedia!!! I'm not quite sure how to spread the word on such a huge gaff (that should have been easily checked by Newsday). Americasroof 14:45, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see, they mistakenly reported that we had made an error. You could ask them to print a retraction, but it's not as exciting a story as if they claimed a different (and wrong) date to us. As far as I can tell, both the Wikipedia article and Newsday agree that the lighthouse was completed in 1796. The reporter seems to have misread our "construction authorised in 1792" as us saying that the lighthouse was built in 1792. Just sloppy reporting on their part. Carcharoth 01:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 21:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinate change

The coordinates listed for the lighthouse is off. These are the actual coordinates:

41.07093,-71.8571

Someone should do something about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.22.244.119 (talk) 20:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why was this moved to "Light"

This article was moved to "Montauk Point Light" which according to the edit summary was per "earlier discussion." That discussion occurred no place here. Most of the articles on Wikipedia still refer to it as "Lighthouse." The master articles on lighthouses still refer to them as lighthouses. The USGS map (and official USGS naming designation) refers to it as "Lighthouse." Why was this done? Americasroof (talk) 18:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to see this discussion. The sign in front even reads "Montauk Point Lighthouse." commons:File:Montauk_Point_Lighthouse_-_Suffolk_County_NY.jpg. --Zimbabweed (talk) 05:58, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In general, Wikipedia uses Light as the preferred term. Talk:Lighthouses_in_the_United_States#Light_or_lighthouse.3F Others sometimes disagree. Ahwiv (talk) 15:55, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Montauk Point Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Official site is broken

Is anybody else having trouble using the official site of the Montauk Point Lighthouse (https://montauklighthouse.com/)? Because I'm seeing nothing but the banner in a white field here. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 03:33, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]