Talk:Morus australis
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Morus australis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170525105020/http://www.forest.go.kr/kna/special/download/English_Names_for_Korean_Native_Plants.pdf to http://www.forest.go.kr/kna/special/download/English_Names_for_Korean_Native_Plants.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Not Broussonetia papyrifera
[edit]- "Not a true mulberry (i.e. "Plants of the World Online" gives M. australis as a synonym of the accepted taxonomic designation, Broussonetia papyrifera, the paper mulberry),[5]"
Well I visited that reference [5], and there is no mention of Broussonetia papyrifera, which is a very very different tree. Jidanni (talk) 04:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- The indicated reference incorrectly invoked the POWO Morus formosensis page in place of the M. australis page. The POWO M. australis page states "This name is a synonym of Broussonetia papyrifera". The reference has been corrected.
- Maidenhair (talk) 20:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Need citation for claim of "the majority of Morus species should be considered a subspecies of alba"
[edit]Australis has properties that are absent in the vast majority of M. alba species, namely linear veination and a mildly rough surface. While it is true that Morus is an incredibly complex genus, this is a very broad and (imo) highly inaccurate statement that should not be posted without a citation. 2601:14D:4A89:940:9550:A71A:91C:D9A1 (talk) 04:08, 20 July 2024 (UTC)