Talk:Mount Erymanthos
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mount Erymanthos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060507165929/http://www.oreivatein.com/page/mountains/a_g/erymanthos/eryman_c.htm to http://www.oreivatein.com/page/mountains/a_g/erymanthos/eryman_c.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.farron.gr/city/landscape.html8
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
--Marjan Tomki SI (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2022 (UTC)==The livepedia gig== I removed this section:
References This article incorporates texts from the Greek language online encyclopedia livepedia.gr which is published under the GFDL.
Our article on "Livepedia" refers to it in the past tense, and I can't find access to any encyclopedia of that name. Our link to it references a site called Livepedia but it is only an advertising site. I suppose someone took it off someone else's hands for a price and turned it into what it is now. Our article on the Greek Wikipedia explains that many of the early articles came from Livepedia. Not so. They came from translations as this article would have. Whatever the Greek text was apparently is long gone or unidentifiable. I do not think this is any sort of "reference" so I am taking the section out. The license under which it is said to have been taken does not require any attribution. Attribute to what? To whom? What exactly is attributed? How can you possibly prove it? No, we don't need it. I recommend the whole thing be rewritten with bona fide references. I am putting a request for references at the top.Botteville (talk) 01:46, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Botteville: A lot of internet sites (often with good data on different subjects) is, or was, created and mantained by private individuals (or their firm...). When those people stop paying the fee for the domain (and noone else takes over to keep the site up, and paying for it), the domain is for grab, and often got misused (can be malware too, not only adware). It usually happens when they die, or retire and firm is sold to another owner (who dismisses, or sometimes just drops old contents from) the old internet site.
- It seems something like that happened to Livepedia. Sometimes those sites got gathered into some internet archive before disapearing, and bots try to find them there for cited sources in Wikipedia. You might try to find out if this one also got gathered into such an archive. Otherwise, we work under Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and the refference text names extict page did under GFDL. I am not sure if disapearance of the web site frees us from obligation to acknowledging contributions from them, so I would keep mention of the old source somewhere, like we require for using contents of Wikipedia. --Marjan Tomki SI (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2022 (UTC)