Talk:Mullumbimby

Australia: Places / New South Wales Low‑importance

	Australia portal Mullumbimby is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

NPOV

Quoting an unnamed resident is very POV and not in keeping with wikpedia's NPOV policy. If there is any report on differences between the alternative culture people and town conservatives, that needs to be expressed more neutrally and referenced.Julia Rossi 01:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woolworths

This new section is quite unencyclopedic; WP:NOTSOAPBOX. The section either needs a rewrite to provide a more balanced POV or it will be removed. Even then, I don't think it will be particularly noteworthy. The source that is cited does not appear to be from a third party and will be removed unless the section becomes more balanced. Also, the section lacks time context; when did these events occur and at what stage is the development up to. It would be more appropriate to wait until the project is finalised or put a clear, balanced statement of what stage the project is at. Bleakcomb (talk) 03:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vaccination rate

I believe it should be noted somewhere that Mullumbimby has the lowest vaccination rate in all of Australia. Thoughts? - Akievsky (talk) 14:36, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not surprising - the region recently defeated another attempt to have the drinking water fluoridated if I'm not mistaken. That part of the country has a lot of New Agers and alternative lifestyle types who think anything that is not "natural" is not safe. I don't see any harm in adding this info to the article. Gatoclass (talk) 16:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Worth mentioning. Doctorhawkes (talk) 21:07, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a "Health" section - comments and criticisms welcome. Akievsky (talk) 21:24, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have given it a tweak or two to reflect the sources a little more closely, and formatted the references. Gatoclass (talk) 09:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also added a line on fluoridation. Gatoclass (talk) 09:48, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the improvements! Akievsky (talk) 11:48, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mullumbimby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110218122425/http://www.australiantraveller.com/destinations/nsw/byron-bay/2887 to http://www.australiantraveller.com/destinations/nsw/byron-bay/2887

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]