Talk:NIR 80 Class

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK / Passenger trains Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	February 1, 2013

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

This article lacks references.

Sandite vehicle

It's highly unlikely that the sandite train will return to use because Translink plan to purchase a new one as part of their capital expenditure plans in the next 2 years.Jimmy1109 (talk) 19:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC) So we all thought - but it kept going until 2017! We're now simply waiting for confirmation that 97 will be scrapped or otherwise disposed of. AndyB (talk) 19:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vehicle 8099

If anyone is wondering where 8099 is, it hasn't been "Scrapped" - it's sitting in the car park of the East Lancashire Railway in Bury, Manchester, England, with a little bit of rust showing but otherwise in fairly good nick, no idea what it's doing there, it isn't railed or anything. Photograph at my site here taken last week: http://www.britainsrailway.co.uk/v/dmu/Northern+Ireland+Railways+80+Class+DMU.jpg.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.219.178.1 (talk) 21:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incident involving Class 80

This incident which involve a door opening and hitting a bridge was a one off, not as has been reported by the person vandalising the page. The door had not been properly closed at the last stop. It has not happened since, and checks have been stepped up at each station. Please stop vandalising.Jimmy1109 (talk) 23:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Power car names

Anyone know whether or not the names added to this section are vandalism or is this true? There doesn't seem to be a source for this, so if this could be confirmed, that'd be great! Jimmy1109 (talk) 10:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, never worry, I've managed to confirm it! lol Jimmy1109 (talk) 11:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown Fates

In the vehicle fate tables, several vehicles are listed as Unknown. Is this necessary when we know they were scrapped, even if the date/scrapping company/reason for scrapping are unknown? Otherwise Unknown implies the vehicle is lost somewhere. Or is there a reason behind such an option?

Notes on scrapping and in particular 8767/8740

Several vehicles were described as having been removed and "destroyed" in 2008. As the word destroyed implies unauthorised destruction rather than proper scrapping, I have changed this to scrapping.

8767 and 8740 were described as having been destroyed by NIR by fire. As this is potentially libellous I have changed it to simply "Destroyed by fire" - if you wish to change this back, please provide evidence. AndyB (talk) 19:41, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]