Talk:Naturally aspirated engine
|WikiProject Automobiles||(Rated Start-class, High-importance)|
Shouldn't this article be called by the more common nomenclature "Normally-aspirated engine"? Quicksilver 20:51, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
No, because Normally-aspirated is the incorrect term. 126.96.36.199
I have removed "normally-aspirated" from the article. I was unable to find any such term being used in engineering texts that discuss internal combustion engine design theory and am reasonably certain it is spurious in this regard...
Is the term naturally more like meaning word nature or more like not-forced(free-flowing)?