Talk:Neuroscience of sleep

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the brain, nerves and nervous system.

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Larynx#Descended larynx|descended]] The anchor (#Descended larynx) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Sleeping Beauty (painting)

How do we "know" that this beautiful painting is from the painter's last half-year of life? He was known for his fairy tale & mythological paintings much earlier than that.

Here is a site (not necessarily a reliable one.) claiming that the painting is from "between 1900 and 1926" and another that says the same. Here is a site saying "Early 20th Century", and here is another site that says the same. Finally a site presumably of the museum in the painter's own home where it says 1900-1926.

I'll just change our date to "Early 20th century" unless/until a source is provided for 1926, OK? --Hordaland (talk) 01:35, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

deep sleep

http://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2014/09/027.html

I'm not sure how legit this is, but there's this part of the brain for deep sleep. Can someone with knowledge on this please paraphrase it? --99.245.28.74 (talk) 00:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this is exciting news. But as Wikipedia isn't a news magazine, I agree that someone well-qualified in both the subject matter and in Wikipedia policies and guidelines should please have a look. --Hordaland (talk) 15:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I came here from the note at WT:NEURO. The news source cites, in turn, a scholarly article in Nature Neuroscience. I think that the latter would be fine to cite as a reliable source here. However, because it is a single primary source, due weight requires that it be presented only briefly and not be over-"sold". --Tryptofish (talk) 20:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neuroscience of sleep. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070110112341/http://science.education.nih.gov/supplements/nih3/sleep/guide/info-sleep.htm to http://science.education.nih.gov/supplements/nih3/sleep/guide/info-sleep.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]