Jump to content

Talk:New Jersey Route 37

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNew Jersey Route 37 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 26, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Comments

[edit]

Would the Garden State Parkway be ok, on the NJ 37 page, since it's pretty major coming out of Seaside?

Alansohn, would the GSP/US 9 shields be acceptable in the NJ 37 info box, because that'd be pretty major for people coming out of Seaside, and Route 9 shares the parkway

Route 37 infobox

[edit]

Was the GSP/US 9 shields ok to add on the NJ 37 major junction box?

Nextbarker 04:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)nextbarker[reply]

Of course. It's the most major junction on Route 37. -- NORTH talk 00:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 37/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This was a very well-written article, and I found it easy to follow. For the most part, it currently meets the GA criteria. There are a few (mainly cosmetic) things that came up during the review:

  1. At the end of the second paragraph of the lead and into the third paragraph, three consecutive sentences begin with "Route 37". Can at least one be changed (preferably the middle one) for some variety?
  2. Use of "then" is frowned upon by many reviewers, and I must admit that it became distracting in the "Route description" section. It is assumed that you are describing the progression of the road, so "then" is usually not necessary.
  3. Toms River Times and The New York Times should be italicized in the references section.

I will place this nomination on hold to allow for these concerns to be addressed and/or discussed. Any questions and/or comments can be left here, as I have placed this page on my watchlist. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:42, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone back and made the suggested changes. Dough4872 (talk) 20:24, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It looks good now. I am promoting the article. Thanks for your quick response, GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:53, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USRD GA audit

[edit]

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Dough4872 (talk) 22:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New Jersey Route 37. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]