Talk:New Jersey Route 37
|New Jersey Route 37 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.|
|WikiProject U.S. Roads||(Rated GA-class, High-importance)|
|WikiProject New Jersey||(Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)|
Would the Garden State Parkway be ok, on the NJ 37 page, since it's pretty major coming out of Seaside?
Alansohn, would the GSP/US 9 shields be acceptable in the NJ 37 info box, because that'd be pretty major for people coming out of Seaside, and Route 9 shares the parkway
Route 37 infobox
Was the GSP/US 9 shields ok to add on the NJ 37 major junction box?
Nextbarker 04:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)nextbarker
- This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 37/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
This was a very well-written article, and I found it easy to follow. For the most part, it currently meets the GA criteria. There are a few (mainly cosmetic) things that came up during the review:
- At the end of the second paragraph of the lead and into the third paragraph, three consecutive sentences begin with "Route 37". Can at least one be changed (preferably the middle one) for some variety?
- Use of "then" is frowned upon by many reviewers, and I must admit that it became distracting in the "Route description" section. It is assumed that you are describing the progression of the road, so "then" is usually not necessary.
- Toms River Times and The New York Times should be italicized in the references section.
I will place this nomination on hold to allow for these concerns to be addressed and/or discussed. Any questions and/or comments can be left here, as I have placed this page on my watchlist. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:42, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
USRD GA audit
This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)