Talk:Nitro (character)

Iron Man Connection

Nitro's bio on Marvel.com has recently, rather conspicuously, been updated to reveal that Tony Stark has access to a frequency that can force Nitro to detonate. Seems somewhat notable. 24.62.27.66 04:29, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Power Boost

It seems as though Nitro recieved a power boost, in Wolverine #43, during the call when he is talking to the government offical you can see the pills he was given. Hempeater 10:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, Nitro calls them MHG, or Mutant Growth Hormones. Essentially, they're a kind of super steriod that can temporarily grant superhuman powers to ordinary humans while dramatically increasing the superhuman powers of a superhuman user, at least so long as they take the pills.

Fair use rationale for Image:Nitrocw.jpg

Image:Nitrocw.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Cm34.jpg

Image:Cm34.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Nitro MCU versus Nitro from Earth-616: Is that actually Nitro on TV?

Calling all wiki writers!

There seems to be no small amount of disagreement over whether or not the Inhuman and would-be Watchdog assassin, Terrence Shockley, is the Marvel Cinematic Universe version of Nitro.

Are we to wait until either the MCU character bio exactly matches that of their Earth-616 counterpart? Or is it sufficient to observe matching powers of unique Marvel supervillains -especially when their powers are negated in the same way they were in the comics?

Because if we have to wait until some time as somebody IN SHOW somehow manages to call his character "Nitro," don't we have to do the same with almost every last supervillain that has showed up in the TV series so far?

Did they specifically call Creel "The Absorbing Man?" Or Franklin Hall, "Graviton?"

Do we have to erase a whole bunch of other Wikipedia entries now, if we can't informally call Shockley, 'MCU Nitro?'— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thanos777 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

When there is no shared name, and no reliable source indicating that Shockley is intended to be Nitro, then yes, it falls under WP:OR, and should not be listed. He might as well be the MCU version of The Human Bomb until then. --Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 19:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Alternatively, there could be an interview with a showrunner where they explain that there's legal reasons for not using the name "Nitro" (example only - I have no idea).

That, or, find some reliable reviews of the episode that make the comparison between the characters. Then it won't be original research. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 October 2020

45.228.206.153 (talk) 01:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)