Talk:Norris Green

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merseyside Mid‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

When was this built? When was the land donated? Which Lord Derby, for that matter? If these questions can't be answered then the article might as well be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 12:22, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Someone keeps amending perfectly accurate information with nonsense. Can this person explain why they get a kick out of this?

Public houses[edit]

To say that no public houses have been built within the boundaries of Norris Green is not entirely correct. Initially this may have been the case, as the Corporation wished to encourage temperance and abstinence. However, for may years there has been several licenced bars in the estate: The Conservative Club and the Broadway Club (both in Broadway), The Norgreen (Townsend Avenue - now closed) and the Green Peppers (Parthenon Drive).

As well as these social clubs two pubs opened in the 1990's O'Rourke's (In Broadway - next to the market) and Valentinos(Utting Avenue East in the old Broadway Hall building).

Deletions[edit]

The folloing keeps getting removed.

Though neither organization accepts complaints from the public. The mechanism by which the members of the various boards of LHT are appointed is not open to public scrutiny. LHT also sells property on the open market there is little or no supervison of the standards of these properties above standard commercial requirments.

LHT also uses the Independent Housing Ombudsman scheme, the IHOS is funded by the housing trusts which use it. The IHOS it has been found in breach of the Data Protection act when responding to complaints by members of the public. The mechanism by which the Ombudsman is appointed is also not open to public scrutiny.

If it is not true provide some evidence that they do accept complaints, that the IHOS is not funded by the Housing Trusts which use it together with the way in which the boards is slected.--84.9.192.214 00:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia, the burden of proof traditionally lies with the person making the claim. If you believe it is true, you should provide a source. Also, it may be being removed because of the grammatical mistakes. (|-- UlTiMuS ^{( U • T • C | M • E )} 00:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The IHOS web site say's how they are funded. And neither of the other two organisation accept complaints from the public. Have a look at there web site. You'll also note that they have not backup any of there claims. I'm sure you could fix the gramtic aerrors if you wanted, so why don't you? Why is the gramar content more important thanthe facts?

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Norris Green. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081005030207/http://liverpoolstreetgallery.com/thumbnails.php?album=20 to http://liverpoolstreetgallery.com/thumbnails.php?album=20

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]