Talk:Northern Institute of Technology Management

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Germany: Hamburg Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Hamburg portal This article is supported by the Hamburg task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. Once references have been added, remove the `\|unref=` from this template.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Muhandes (talk) 22:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Northern Institute of Technology → Northern Institute of Technology Management – The current name of this article is incomplete and misleading since it omits the 'Technology Management' portion of the University's title (as seen on the University's website)184.22.95.56 (talk) 03:24, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support but the logo in Infobox needs to be fixed as well --নাফী ম. সাধ nafSadh^{talk | contribs} 14:38, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I really don't see why discussion is required on a non-controversial move. I went bold and moved.--Muhandes (talk) 22:28, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.