Jump to content

Talk:Norwich Airport

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ryanair

[edit]

Can I ask where the comment on the runway being to short for Ryanair B738s to land only using reverse thrust came from, I think (open to correction) that this is complete rubbish if a Boeing 767-300ER aircraft finds the runway sufficiently long enought to land, an aircraft much much larger. Wozza 1 13:14 13 April 2006 (GMT)

I agree with Wozza, sounds like fantasy to me too. Unless someone can corroborate I think that it should be deleted. Rob 12:58, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As the 767 is the more recent perhaps it has a better design in terms of air-brakes, low landing speed etc than the older 737? GraemeLeggett 15:09, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The 767 is not more recent than the Next Generation 737-800's operated by Ryanair. Field length is a function of available thrust and braking distance and often it is the rejected takeoff length which is the critical deciding factor rather than landing stop distances. This document http://www.aaiu.ie/upload/general/4757-0.PDF talks about a Ryanair landing and they use both systems for stopping as I would expect (though not to particularly good effect in this case!). Think that it should be deleted. Rob 15:20, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed it to state that there have just been rumours about such a service, if anyone wants to add to that then please do, preferably consulting this discussion page and backing up statements with evidence --wozza 16:01, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nwia22.jpg

[edit]

Image:Nwia22.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RAF Horsham St Faith

[edit]

Should the early history be moved into the RAF Horsham St Faith article (currently a redirect) and this article details the history since 1963. Any thoughts ? MilborneOne 20:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A reasonable idea and then this article can retain a brief summary and an appropiate "main" link. GraemeLeggett 09:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Split completed, although the two articles might need a bit more of a tidy up. MilborneOne 11:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Norwich International Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Norwich International Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:11, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Norwich Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Norwich_Airport&oldid=1204340818"