Talk:One.Tel
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Intro needs to be significntly rewritten. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.105.122.206 (talk • contribs)
Why is the info on CallMe being deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Callmeau (talk • contribs) 10:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
The info under the CallMe/Me Australia has no sources whatsoever, and also sounds very much like an advertisment, as such I have removed this info. Please discuss. Xt881m (talk) 15:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Oops, I forgot to sign-in and have resigned the above comment, sorry all. The last edit to the page was also me. Xt881m (talk) 15:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Neutral Point of View
[edit]Adding a point of view tag for review. Reading through the history, it reads as though it has been authored by someone close to involved persons or, at very least, someone variable.
It certainly lacks objectivity and/or impartiality
Additionally, the history reads like a news article, with a journalist's point of view, not an objective encyclopaedic article
- C-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- C-Class Sydney articles
- Low-importance Sydney articles
- WikiProject Sydney articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- C-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Telecommunications articles
- Low-importance Telecommunications articles