Talk:Operation Musketeer (1956)

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / French / Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

vidz

i have posted rare archive videos of the brits and french in the suez crisis article's media links and discussion page. some will be moved here. Shame On You 03:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

full campaign report!! everything!

Amiral Barjot's report on the suez campaign pt.1&pt.2 French Minister of Defense archives. Shame On You 02:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Immediate suggestions

Ummm, can we say a) where the operation took place and b) when? I mean we haven't even localized it to a century!

Also, the controversy over the landing selection -- the choice of Port Said rather than the Army's preference to land at Alexandria -- should be detailed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.182.88 (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

International reaction

South Africa strongly supported the military operation at the United Nations, along with Australia and New Zealand. (92.10.140.17 (talk) 14:58, 27 July 2012 (UTC))[reply]

When you return from your block, please provide a source for your statement.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you even remotely familiar with the banning policy? Did you completely miss where he didn't even bother to deny being a sock at the SPI? He is banned, he is a sock, this discussion is pointless. 2 lines of K₃₀₃ 17:01, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a source from 1986: http://www.historytoday.com/robert-james/anthony-eden-and-suez-crisis (92.7.20.126 (talk) 11:25, 28 July 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Map

This article would benefit from a map, particularly showing the extent of land invasion. Davidships (talk) 09:21, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Operation Musketeer (1956). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090205130842/http://britains-smallwars.com:80/suez/untis.html to http://www.britains-smallwars.com/suez/untis.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]