Jump to content

Talk:Optonica

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A good start

[edit]

This is an good start for what could be an excellent article. But it has a few problems.

  • no cites. It mentions sources, but it's unclear what's coming from where.
  • it offers too many unattributed opinions. Wikipedia doesn't declare what's remarkable or beautiful. It states facts and leaves the opinions to others.
  • the tone is just a bit too much like an essay of personal observations
  • it overreaches in deciding what motivated Sharp, and what the legacy of Optonica is. Again, this is not for Wikipedia to decide.
  • it uses weasel words, like "probably" and "considered"

--Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Main reference

[edit]

A reference is obviously needed for Optonica sales catalogue OP-FB 10/77
--Brenont (talk) 22:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]