This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles
The paragraph that starts with "Recent research in the 2020s continues to explore the concept of pyroluria,..." It the editor added three references to the paragraph to support their information. I have concerns with all three refences. First and most concerning is the mentalvitamin.co/pyroluria-what-is-it-and-is-it-real this is from a website that sells vitamins and clearly is not a RS. In addition it cites "The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine" which is the official journal of the Society for Acupuncture Research which acupuncture is considered a pseudoscience so any journal by them is in question. The final citation is the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, which is part of the MDPI journals. There are multiple concerns that the MDPI journals practice predatory journal practices and therefore should not be trusted. I move to remove the new section as pseudoscientific information with no value in an encyclopedia. VVikingTalkEdits22:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]