Talk:Otto Heuer

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New article

Medarduss, thank you for creating the article.

You have tagged it with More citations needed, could you tag individual sentences or sections instead to highlight what needs to be cited? For notability, Heuer seems to meet WP:NACADEMIC as he held the highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.
de:Veit Valentin (Pädagoge) was Chairman of the Academic Committee, I am not sure if that makes him the predecessor of Heuer as director of the Hochstift. Oddly, Heuer is described as zweite Direktor here, presumably after Volger. I have added a list of directors to the Hochstift article.

TSventon (talk) 09:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added templates to the sentences I meant. These were taken from the German Wikipedia article and I didn't find a source for them.
I am not sure about the predecessor thing, I think I am probably wrong to put Veit Valentin, but I don't think Karl Nikolaus Berg was the director between 1881-1887 either. I will have a read of the Adler FDH history and update this article. It is odd that that site describes Otto Heuer as the second director. The only reason I can think for that would be if the heads of the FDH between Volger and Heuer used another title than "director". Medarduss (talk) 09:40, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
TSventon, I have just checked in Adler; Berg was re-elected as "Obmann" in 1883 and 1884, but stood down on 17 November 1885. Seng says that Valentin was the Chairman of the Academic Committee (as you noted), organised lectures, helped write the yearbook and organised exhibitions. So he did a lot, but wasn't the "director". I can't find anything saying there was a leader between Berg and Heuer. Medarduss (talk) 10:08, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Medarduss, zweite Direktor could mean after Volger and it could also be a mistake. Could you add a reference for Berg as Obmann from 1881 to 1885 in the Hochstift article? The title of director seems to relate to the opening of the Goethe Museum in 1897, so Heuer probably doesn't need a predecessor in the infobox. If you have translated content from de Wikipedia you should use an edit summary like Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. TSventon (talk) 11:42, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think it could be a mistake. Sorry about not including the de Wiki attribution. I will remove Berg from Heuer's infobox, and add a sentence saying that Berg served as chairman between 1881 and 1885 + references. I don't know where it is best to put so feel free to change it.

Medarduss (talk) 11:51, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Medarduss the de Wiki attribution can be added at any time so I added it. Thank you for the Berg sentence. I have added a potentially useful source below from Heuer's dissertation at Google books. TSventon (talk) 07:39, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah that sentence looks good for clearing up some of the "citation needed" templates. Did you translate it yourself? Medarduss (talk) 08:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to say - thanks for finding it :) Medarduss (talk) 08:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I guessed that a. = anno, vv. dd. = venerable doctors and then used Google translate. I am surprised by the lack of sources, presumably the Hochstift would have them if they existed. It would be interesting, but difficult, to check pre-war newspapers for obituaries. TSventon (talk) 09:15, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Latin vita

Natus sum Georgius Hermannus Henricus Otto Heuer Hannoverae die VImensis Februarii anno MDCCCLIV patre Friderico Guilelmo , praematura morte jam erepto , matre Emilia e gente Kuhlemann . Fidei addictus sum evangelicae . In disciplinae rudimenta a magistris gymnasia urbici Hannoverani introductus sum . Testimonium maturitatis adeptus anno MDCCCLXXII Lipsium migravi , ut studio veterum praecipue vero historiae imcumberem . Ubi per quinquies sex menses me docuerunrt venerabiles doctores Biedermann , Brockhaus , Curtius , Hermann , Pückert , Ritschl , Voigt , Wenck , Wuttke , Zarncke . Inde in Boemiam me contuli , ubi octo per annos adolesceultulum quondam e nobili genere natum in litterisque erudivi . Deinde in patriam reversus ab auctumno anno MDCCCLXXXII civibus academiae Berolinensis adscriptus sum . Hic per quinque semestria audivi venerabiles doctores Breslau , Delbrück , Dilthey , Droysen , Koser , Wattenbach , Weizsäcker . Adexercitationes benigne mihi aditum concesserunt Lipsiae venerabilis doctor Wuttke , Berolini Breslau , Delbrück , Droysen , Koser , Wattenbach , Weizsäcker . His omnibus viris optime de me meritis ex animi sententia gratias ago, summas autem Julio Weizsäcker, quem semper benignissime studiis meis favisse pio animo confitior .
I was born Georg Hermann Heinrich Otto Heuer in Hanover on the 6th of February in the year 1854, to my father Friedrich Wilhelm, who had already been saved by premature death, and to my mother Emilia, of the Kuhlemann family. I am attached to the evangelical faith. I was introduced to the rudiments of training by the teachers of the Hanoverian city gymnasium. Having obtained the certificate of maturity in 1872, I moved to Leipzig, in order to devote myself to the study of the ancients, especially history. Where for five to six months I was taught by the venerable doctors Biedermann, Brockhaus, Curtius, Hermann, Pückert, Ritschl, Voigt, Wenck, Wuttke, Zarncke. From there I moved to Bohemia, where for eight years I educated a youth once born of a noble family in literature. Then, returning to my country, from the autumn of the year 1882 I was enrolled in the citizens of the Berlin Academy. Here for five semesters I listened to the venerable professors Breslau, Delbrück, Dilthey, Droysen, Koser, Wattenbach, Weizsäcker. The venerable doctors Wuttke of Leipzig and Breslau, Delbrück, Droysen, Koser, Wattenbach, Weizsäcker of Berlin kindly granted me access to the exercises. I thank all these men from the best of my heart for their merits, but most of all to Julio Weizsäcker, whom I trust to have always kindly favoured my studies with a pious heart.

— Otto Heuer, from his dissertation, Städtebundsbestrebungen unter König Sigmund I.

TSventon (talk) 07:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]