Talk:Ottoman Navy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ottoman Navy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / Ottoman / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Ottoman military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Former countries: Ottoman Empire Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire (assessed as Top-importance).

Turkey Start‑class High‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 18 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Metrboom13.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Needs references, even if they're not in English. Cla68 07:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Italo-Turkish War

Some mention of the Ottoman Navy's routes concurrent to WW1 should be made. --NEMT (talk) 20:39, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Raided"

Isn't that pure piracy? A fleet that goes somewhere 'just to raid' sounds like piracy. --94.71.93.204 (talk) 18:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When it is a nation-state doing it, it's only "pure piracy" to the pirated. The pirates consider themselves privateers if not "navies". Cf. English and Spanish opinions on the buccaneers or English opinion on Drake versus English opinion on the Barbary corsairs. — LlywelynII 08:26, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The finer points of piracy vs privateering were quite irrelevant in the 16th century. Any attempt differentiate between the two before well into the early modern period is fairly anachronistic since the whole idea relies on reasonably standardized international maritime law and monopoly on violence. Hardly any states at the time could be reasonably defined as nation states, and certainly not the Ottoman Empire and its suzerain satellites in North Africa. "Raiding" or even "sea roving" would be a more appropriate and neutral description.

Peter ^Isotalo 13:16, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First fortress built in 1351? Don't think so...

Marked this passage dubious

The first Ottoman fortress in Europe was built in 1351

All the sources I've seen (that weren't so lazy they start with Gallipoli) claim the Turks' first European fortress was Tzympe in 1352. That was a Byzantine fortress they either took over or raided. Is there a name and a cite for this earlier, Turkish-constructed fortress? — LlywelynII 08:26, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the whole section (page?) was lifted from this unsourced site. Plagiarism issues? — LlywelynII 10:18, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Hamid

Material is now available on Wiki Commons for this cruiser of 1903 Abdul Hamid. Editors are invited to use this.TWAMWIR (talk) 14:00, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Ottoman Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:08, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WW1

Any article on the Ottoman Navy needs to mention its role in the beginning of the Ottomans' involvement in WW1 - the attack on the Russian Black Sea coast on 29 Oct 1914. This began the Ottoman's involvement in the war.

Wikipedia Tarzan (talk) 10:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Ottoman galleon.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]