Talk:Overseas Patrol Squadron
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Overseas Patrol Squadron article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 31, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that two destroyers of the Royal Navy's Fishery Protection Squadron, commanded by a commodore aboard a fishing trawler (pictured), once thwarted an Icelandic boarding attempt? |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]This article is expanding at a phenomenal pace, which I naturally feel eager to applaud in the fullest and sincerest manner, but nevertheless, I believe that, in light of certain issues of that which I believe leave the reader, and indeed are left themselves, significantly wanting of clarification, I am therefore obliged to put forward the broad point with regards to the question of precisely what general sense the article conveys a greater understanding of the arrangement by which such action on the part of either both parties or one of the parties, or indeed (possibly) neither of the parties, in their capacaties both as Sovereign and military entities, or as either one or the other (depending on the answer) may or may not have either contributed to a crisis of conflict unforeseen by either of the aforementioned parties, or indeed solely resulted directly in a similar result to that hitherto discussed? 89.243.190.191 (talk) 13:44, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
- In response, as a party uninvolved in the laudatory expansion but nonetheless genuinely moved to express the heartfelt appreciation I naturally experience as a consequence, or if not as a consequence then most certainly as a concomitant parallel to the submission of your enquiry, a submission may I assure you of exemplary clarity. I am lead, or if not lead then at least prompted to respond (perhaps) in a manner which necessarily depends on which aspects in the (aforementioned) submission are uppermost, and indeed providing it can be established whether they are uppermost in the fullest possible way. Not withstanding, may I assure you that these capacities, which may be what you really had in mind, whether unhesitatingly Sovereign or merely military, have neither contributed nor not contributed, but instead rest in a manner where the parties have not only foreseen the crisis of conflict (depending on the question) but have allowed the conflict to incubate over the passage of time to a level where it is not merely a crisis, but a matter of grave prescience. --Epipelagic (talk) 16:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Second Cod War?
[edit]The article skips from First to Third. Please remedy. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Name change to Overseas Patrol Squadron
[edit]See:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- B-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- B-Class Fishing articles
- Low-importance Fishing articles
- WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing articles