Talk:Paramashiva (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Karnataka / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 31 December 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 21:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paramashiva → Paramashiva (film) – Paramashiva should redirect to Parashiva, per WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. The deity (under any of various spellings) is of far more encyclopedic primacy than an obscure film named after the religious figure. Disambiguation should be done with hatnotes, per WP:TWODABS. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 20:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support, speedy per WP:ASTONISH In ictu oculi (talk) 09:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination and In ictu oculi. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 08:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with the others above and the rationale provided. The deity article is indeed one that the reader would be expecting and would be astonished with the film result. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:16, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nominator. I don't think anyone is going to contest this, so might as well apply WP:SNOWBALL. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 14:22, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.