This article was nominated for deletion on 8 September 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article includes using AllMusic, cited a total or three times in the lead. Some may not realize that AllMusic is owned by RhythmOne that specializes in digital advertising that provides "promotional advertisements and messages delivered through email, social media websites, online advertising on search engines, banner ads on mobile or Web sites and affiliates programs.". When approximately 42% of the references in an article directly mention and cite an "advertising" company there is a "not so subtle" promotional slant that looks like publicity.
The title is confusing and certainly ambiguous. I did not have any idea from the title what the article "might" be about because the lead refers to a "project" that is actually and apparently a band. When searching words "have to be used" to disambiguate or the results returns hits related to jobs. An article cannot be presented or written to target or recognizable by only a fan base or it lands in the middle of "What Wikipedia is not".
Other issues would be the lack of reliable sources providing significant coverage that are independent of the subject. While blogs or interviews might be acceptable for content they do not necessarily advance notability. An embedded list as a "Discography" section might be acceptable if the things listed all have articles otherwise it gives the appearance of original research to anyone not a fan. When a subject is presented so ambiguous as to be confusing and hard to search then it becomes necessary, and not out-of-line, to expect "someone" to prove sources exist. Otr500 (talk) 02:41, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
