Talk:Peter Brady

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 17:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Brady → Peter Brady (disambiguation) –

Peter Brady (The Brady Bunch) is a more popular subject, so, per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, "Peter Brady" must be a redirect to List of The Brady Bunch characters#Peter Brady. George Ho (talk) 05:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose! Peter Brady is fictional character! What on earth makes him more primary than real people? And "Peter Brady (The Brady Bunch)" is just a redirect; you want to displace a dab page for a redirect? Sheesh! Moonraker12 (talk) 13:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- He has 2,000 hits within 90 days, unless numbers are proven to be meaningless: http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Peter%20Brady%20(The%20Brady%20Bunch). Others... not as popular. Even fictional may be more popular than real. --George Ho (talk) 13:23, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- A fictional character is unlikely to be primary. Certainly, a redirect should never be the primary article. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:30, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Layout

I’ve re-formatted this; the lead sentence was edited to imply there is a primary topic, which is a matter currently under discussion; I’ve restored the “no primary topic” format appropriate to the current title, so as to avoid the suggestion it is malplaced. If the RM is resolved in favour of a PT, it can be changed then. Moonraker12 (talk) 16:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]