Talk:Philip Carl Salzman

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Salzman notable

This guy is an academic whose work is being discussed regularly in major newspapers. On a larger scale, I think wikipedia has a bias against academics. Even extremely minor actors have wikipedia pages. Why not academics whose ideas are drawing notice?American Clio (talk) 15:55, 25 January 2008 (UTC)American Clio[reply]

I don't understand, was there some suggestion that Salzman not be in Wikipedia? In 2017 Salzman's work is considered foundational in helping Western scholars remember that non-Western societies frequently are not nation-states, a notion of the self relatively recent even in the West. It was all about blood relations, in a word, "tribe." England in the 1700s does not think it odd to invite a Hanoverian George to take over, who doesn't even speak English. Personally, I'd expand Salzman to show his influence but have a mss must finish before semester starts. Profhum (talk) 20:04, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Balance?

One quote praising him and his work, none of the entirely relevant criticism he's garnered? This seems like a bit of a puff piece. JamesG5 (talk) 05:49, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is entirely a puff piece, and one that glazes over some unfortunate implications in terms of Salzman's political rhetoric and other beliefs at that. However considering that Salzman apparently seems to think that Arabs in general (although he has a particular antipathy towards the Palestinians) are lesser and less civilized in general as a people, I wouldn't be surprised if the creator of the article doesn't see those views as unfortunate or extremely hyperbolic in the first place. 2607:FEA8:A4E0:11EC:DCD4:645F:5F8B:9692 (talk) 21:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]