Talk:Phonehenge West

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (I'm not done! I just started creating it and applying my sources and when I clicked preview/save it's telling me it's being deleted, wtf? Phonehenge was a giant structure that hundreds of peoopled toured every year. If Lady Gaga is on wikipedia this should be a well. This man spent 30 years constructing it and it's all over the news, why wouldn't it be in here??????) --Travisvadon1 (talk) 02:51, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary tangent?

I won't presume to do such major editing, but isn't the detailed paragraph on Stonehenge an unnecessary tangent (not to mention, duplicated information)? Why not just explain the pun's basis and include a link to the Stonehenge page? Wouldn't a photo be invaluable here, too, as P.W. was such a visual phenomenon? (And perhaps the "Contested Deletion" entry before this one can be, er, deleted now, as the article is still here two years later. If only the same could be said for P.W. itself.) – AndyFielding (talk) 01:31, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]