This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the NorthGermanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
Many thanks for the informative genetics attributions. However, in wikipedia or any other encyclopedia, we do not need the journal name nor the month of publication in the main text! Rather, start with the lead author and year. Anything else belongs into the references. Thank You.HJHolm (talk) 08:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Hunan201p: I think it wouldn't hurt to add a bit about the context of the two samples, especially since the Genetics section is the usual unencyclopedic and unreadable hodgepodge of "Source A says this, Source B says that". Maybe you can paraphrase the part about "shar[ing] part of [...] phenotypic variation with SHGs" into Wikivoice. Austronesier (talk) 12:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All good advice, thanks. I attempted this recently but am not the best writer so you'll probably see fit to clean it up. I did take the leap of specifying the skin pigmentation-related genes at which the SNPs were located, which may deviate too far in to WP:OR, as the inline only mentions the SNPs... Though it does read better than "rs16891982" and "rs1426654". - Hunan201p (talk) 17:14, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]