Talk:Planet Simpson
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Title
[edit]I would suggest changing this title to Planet Simpson. Leave the intro description as it is, but use only the title and not the subtitle in the actual title itself. I'll probably go ahead and make this change unless anyone objects in the next few days... --Hunter Kahn (talk) 18:40, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Expanding this article
[edit]I added the expansion tag to the article since whether this is still a stub or (as I think it now qualifies) a start grade article it definitely needs to be expanded. I'm going to try to add more expansive chapter summaries when I get a chance to start but I'm not sure what else we can do to expand this article more. Cat-five - talk 19:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, it doesn't need more expansive chapter summaries, what it needs is more real world information. For example, see My Life as a Ten Year Old Boy or The Simpsons: An Uncensored, Unauthorized History. Very little content summarizing. -- Scorpion0422 23:43, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- That's a good example. I took the liberty of adding a todo list to the top of this page and adding a few things from what I noticed Planet Simpson had that this article didn't although I'm sure I missed some things and some of those are very broad. Cat-five - talk 02:18, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- How about finding independent reliable sources to establish notability? It seems it's the only Simpsons related book article with zero cites outside itself.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 23:26, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- That's a good example. I took the liberty of adding a todo list to the top of this page and adding a few things from what I noticed Planet Simpson had that this article didn't although I'm sure I missed some things and some of those are very broad. Cat-five - talk 02:18, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]Background
[edit]Doesn't the background section rely to heavily on quotes?--Gongfat (talk) 18:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. It does. Gran2 22:32, 6 February 2011 (UTC)