Talk:Plastech Engineered Products

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Plastech Engineered Products article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Michigan: Detroit Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

untitled

I'm a little confused as to how a company with 1.7 Billion dollars in annual sales is "not notable".

The bottom end of the Fortune 1000 is 1.5 Billion.

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2007/full_list/901_1000.html

Its the largest women owned business in michigan, and has over 7,000 employees.

Companies like Viewsonic, Nasdaq, and Bob Evans Restaurants are all smaller than Plastech based on annual sales, the measure used by Fortune to establish its list. 67.171.221.191 21:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PROD

Can I refer you to Editing Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Number of employees, turnover, etc. aren't grounds to establish notability.

Response to PROD=

Thanks for the tip dude. ITs all the more puzzling seeing as how the Plastech article has FOUR secondary sources, Viewsonic has NONE, Nasdeq has six, and and bob Evan's NONE.

Plastech's secondary sources include a little outfit called The New York Times, the respected weekely Crain's Detroit Business, a local Michigan TV station WZZM, and the biggest plastics trade journal Plastics News. Redpected secondary sources, just like WP says.

Like I said, if you really cared about WP you'd be deleting those articles, not Plastech's. Do you work for a competitor or something? 67.171.221.191 21:57, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't you just put a stub tab on it? Its obvious your WP concerns are bogus. What do you have against Plastech?

Never heard of this company, don't work for a rival and not even based in the USA. Comparison to other articles doesn't justify this one. There are many articles that need merging, splitting, improving, deleting, etc. Why not follow the guidelines and improve this article? --Arthana 22:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, why not use stub tag? That would get the improvement you seek. Its not a perfect article, but its perfectly legitimate according to WP. Sure it could use more, but four secondary sources is enough according to WP. Stub it. Stub it. Stub it. 67.171.221.191

You are of course free to add the stub tag yourself if you think it will get the desired result.--Arthana 22:09, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remnant Assets

Our bankruptcy postings are created on behalf of our client, Oak Point Partners. We have been asked to adjust these bankruptcy postings to better conform with Wikipedia guidelines and policies, and believe this post to be in compliance. Bankrupt Company News is a service of New Generation Research, Inc., a leading provider of corporate bankruptcy and distressed securities publications, products and services for over 30 years. Through its BankruptcyData, Bankruptcy Week, Distressed Company Alert and The Turnaround Letter offerings, New Generation Research helps to identify, monitor, research and invest in bankrupt and distressed companies (https://www.bankruptcydata.com/about). Bankrupt Company News, with an experienced staff and credible editorial policy, provides factual information regarding bankruptcy transactions. Our provided source is the signed Sale Order approved by the court Judge. If you have any questions about the source or information, please reach out to us for further proposed changes or concerns. Our intention is to keep the public informed about the ownership transfer.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wik-authoring (talk • contribs) 16:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]