Talk:Plus (British TV channel)

Television: British / Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.

Requested Move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was to move this page --Lox (t,c) 16:56, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

more commonly known as Granada Plus, was moved from that location by a known vandal – MrWeeble Talk Brit tv 13:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

Support

MrWeeble Talk Brit tv 13:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
-- 9cds^(talk) 14:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC) - As nom, plus I'm not aware of any rename, and most of the article refers to the name "Granada Plus" anyway.[reply]
You didn't need to put a WP:RM for this up at all, as you can see (I'm not an admin)... --Kiand 15:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like fairly average but annoying vandalism. smurrayinchester^{(User), (Talk)} 16:00, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Fair use rationale for Image:Gplustv.gif

Image:Gplustv.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gplus.jpg

Image:Gplus.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV

Suggest removing the following passage:

"Many of the programmes had originally been recorded on relatively low-quality VT stock, which was common practice in television at the time, as it was never really envisaged that repeated programmes would have any commercially-exploitable value. This gave the programmes a badly-dated appearance, which wasn't helped by the abundance of 1970s and 1980s fashions sported by the characters on screen."

The implication here is that modern viewers don't want to watch shows from the 70s and 80s, especially if they're on videotape, despite their continued appearance on other channels like GOLD and ITV3. Lee M (talk) 01:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please hide the ref

I just made an identity section on this channel, it relies on one source, the source keeps showing up visually idk what cs1 thingy i can do to turn the source into something like this "[5]" but guys pls fix it.

Also do not delete the entire identity section it is my entire work, you guys cant probably make an entire section let alone an article, just fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spongebob796 (talk • contribs) 03:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]