Talk:Podolsk

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the human geography of Russia task force.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Sister cities

The entry for Sukhum, Abkhazia keeps being changed by anonymous IPs based in Georgia. As Abkhazia is recognised as a state by the Russian Federation, it is appropriate to treat Abkhazia as a state in this article. It is not the imaginary Sukhumi or Sokhumi in Georgia that Podolsk has a twinning with, but the real Sukhum, capital of an independent Abkhazia, which hasn't been in Georgia since 1993. If these anonymous IPs don't like this being reverted, I suggest they stop being sneaky and have the courage to discuss the matter on the talk page.Bofoc Tagar (talk) 18:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abkhazia is recognised as a state by the Russian Federation, but it's The English Wikipedia, not the Russian. –BruTe ^Talk 10:51, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the case of a similar dispute relating to Kilmarnock the general consensus seemed to be that the way things were expressed by the parties responsible for the twinning was what counted. The official position of the Russian authorities would imply that the twinning is viewed in the context of Abkhazia being regarded as a sovereign state. Bofoc Tagar (talk) 22:52, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Podolsk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120317052745/http://www.twin-cities.ru/texts/164-Podolsk.pdf to http://www.twin-cities.ru/texts/164-Podolsk.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]