Talk:List of cities in Texas by population

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cities

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Lists

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles

Untitled

Where'd the 563,662 figure for El Paso come from? According to the El Paso entry (at least, as of last July), as well as Google (then and now), El Paso's 2000 population was 679,622. --Mike Schiraldi 4 July 2005 00:33 (UTC)

I realize this post is two years old, but it was never answered. You are confusing the population of the city of El Paso with the population of the metropolitan area of El Paso. Two different numbers. --Holderca1^talk 18:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link Format

Why are all the city names linked as external links that point back to Wikipedia? Why not just link internally to the article? Phasmatisnox 18:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Data missing

Where is New Deal, Texas pop 1708? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pogo-Pogo-Pogo (talk • contribs) 15:00, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to the article on New Deal, the population is 708. If you look at #1041, New Deal is listed. Griffinofwales (talk) 20:48, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lead

The following is the list of Texas' most populous incorporated cities and unincorporated Census Designated Places. Is that true? This looks like a list of all incorporate cities and unincorporated CDPs listed by population. Am I incorrect or should this be rephrased? Griffinofwales (talk) 20:49, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Census Estimate Date

Since they just released the 2011 Census Date for cities with more then 50000 people I decided to update the numbers according with the data provided by the Census

Editing List

I'm currently editing the list I understand that there is still a lot of editing I have to do if anyone wants to help me finish it be great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danny20111993 (talk • contribs) 22:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Long Table

This list is quite long and unwieldy - What do you think of splitting it into 3 tables (>10k, 1-10k, <1k)? --Qetuth (talk) 02:51, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wichita Falls

The city of wichita falls lost population from 2010 to 2011 I'll be changing it to it's originally 2010 census data — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.113.28.183 (talk) 17:55, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Houston

Everyone before trying to change the population of Houston please go here to see why it's different than it's original number http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/City-wins-census-appeal-count-adjusted-4087372.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danny20111993 (talk • contribs) 22:30, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2012 update

Everyone, I'm updating the table with the new 2012 data please do not change or undo. Thank you! :) I'll have sources and everything up and running once I get everything up — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danny20111993 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in List of cities in Texas by population

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of cities in Texas by population's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "factfinder2.census.gov":

From Mansfield, Texas: http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_DP_DPDP1
From Municipalities of Puerto Rico: http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_SF1_QTP10&prodType=table
From El Paso, Texas: "American FactFinder". Factfinder2.census.gov. Retrieved 2012-05-21.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shortening

Why was this entry so hugely shortened? Is anyone planning to expand the list to include all 1200 or so municipalities and 600 or so CDP's? Inkan1969 (talk) 02:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Updating

I just wanted to tell everyone, that if you're planning on changing any of the information on the list please make sure you're using the data from http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk . The reason why is because this table is using the information directly from this data sheet. So any changes done to the table that aren't the same as the website provided will be undone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danny20111993 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

point of this list?

So, what is the point of this list? It has 67 most populous cities, while List of cities in Texas has 100 most populous. It lists all cities, and then has a table with more entries the "main" city population article... 212.50.203.198 (talk) 03:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if it makes a point but this "cities by population" list has three most populous CDP's and 64 most populous cities... And, how could it? CDP is not a city, if I know anything. 85.217.20.204 (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed minor things

The census was done in 2010 and we're barely on 2015 census estimate data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danny20111993 (talk • contribs) 04:57, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of cities in Texas by population. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]