|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Prachanda article.|
|A news item involving Prachanda was featured on Wikipedia's main page in the In the news section on 4 May 2009.|
|This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.|
|This page is about an active politician who is running for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Someone has vandalized this page. The changes made seem really cheap. I would like to request blocking of that IP address - or, at the very least, warn him. how do I do it ? ~(its my wiki username, feel free to email me)
Edited for grammar on 08/10/2013
Category: Democracy activists, "Nepalese People's War"
It seems a shame to put up a Neutrality Disputed banner without discussing anything first. I didn't insert "People's War" in there but I did clarify it by putting "Nepalese" in front of it. "People's War" is what the Maoists called it. A neutral name would be Nepalese Civil War. I didn't see anything about "democracy activists" in there. The statement "[h]e also said that the party had expressed its commitment to multi-party democracy" is in there. That's a factual statement. Prachanda and other top Maoists have said this repeatedly IIRC. They are in favor off the republic, professedly. Sometimes one detects a murmur of "at this time," it is true. If you want to put some skepticism in there, I'd say cite it and do so. You put the banner up, you can take it down. DanielM (talk) 16:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- He's in Category: Democracy activists --Captain Obvious and his crime-fighting dog (talk) 11:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- Prachanda joined the underground communist movement in 1981, at the time there was a royal dictatorship in Nepal, with no multi-party system and limited press freedom. The Nepalese communist movement worked to overthrown the dictatorship and establish a democratic state. The category 'Democracy activists' have huge pov inclusion problems, but as long as the category isn't CFD:ed, I don't see why Prachanda shouldn't be included. --Soman (talk) 13:01, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
It was a multi-party government that he declared war on in 1996 and the monarchy didn't become truly tyrannical until sometime in the last four or five years; correct me if I am wrong. I think he was rehabilitated somewhat by the fact that the monarchy got out of control and the Nepal people with the help of the Maoists reclaimed their country from it, but I don't think Prachanda should be described as a democracy activist or included in any such category. Suggest heeding Captain O's objections: remove the category, change People's War to Civil War, and take down the banner. DanielM (talk) 22:14, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
considering his new role as PM, I think a move to Pushpa Kamal Dahal might be warranted. Nowadays, he's referred to as 'PM Dahal' in Nepalese newsmedia. The underground days are quite definately over now. --Soman (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Biography coming soon
Make sure you mention his caste and/or ethnic group. This is important in Nepali society and relevant to any useful biography of Prachanda. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 02:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
The cited source says 11th so I changed 25 to 11
http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/politics/from-chhabilal-to-pushpa-kamal-to-prachanda-profile_10084654.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edit.exe (talk • contribs) 17:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
This is a proposal to add a Criticism section to the bottom of the article. Like many topics on Wikipedia, espeically those involving countries, politics, war, and current events, there are some pointed criticisms that may not fit well in a chronological history but nonetheless are 'out there'. Though this section might one day be integrated into the main article, I think it would be useful, especially given the somewhat biased tone of the current article, which treats Prachanda as more of a political hero than a NPOV article should. Of course, criticism would have to be sourced and not mere name-calling or rumor-mongering.
I am today in Kathmandu/Nepal and will visit Congress of CPN-Maaoist in the next days i put a new picture in this Page of Prachanda. Regards Juergen —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 06:15, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.