Talk:Princess Sophia's Precedence Act 1711
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
More references
[edit]So exactly what is wrong with the reference currently cited under References? Perhaps that title should be changed to "Reference," singular--but what is the point of additional citations when that given is clearly authoritative? GeorgeTSLC (talk) 16:00, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
P.S. As to importance: On Tuesday 8 March 2005 the then Lord Chancellor mentioned the Act. See http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/briefings/snpc-03417.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgeTSLC (talk • contribs) 16:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- The only reference is the Primary source text that the article is about. As is explained by the maintenance banner we need third party sources that discuss the Act. See WP:Primary. Road Wizard (talk) 18:38, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Stub-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Stub-Class Scotland articles
- Low-importance Scotland articles
- All WikiProject Scotland pages
- Stub-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages